The intrigue
about the America's Cup contest is invariably the question of
boat speed. The fact is, the challenger has never raced the
defender so there has been no direct comparison, ever. We will
see it all for the first time on 19 February, Race 1 of the
America's Cup Match. So there is always a lot of speculation,
a lot of anticipation; but the fact is no one really knows how
close these two boats will be.
| The
fact is, the challenger has never raced the defender so
there has been no direct comparison, ever.
|
The challenger, Prada, has
come through an elimination series that was extremely
hard-fought -- the closest we have seen since 1992. In the
case of the defender, any racing has come purely from within
its own syndicate. This is in contrast to previous defences
where generally the defender trials have been as competitive
as the challenger trials, if not more so.
Notwithstanding, the New Zealanders are going to be very
competitive based on the personnel they have had on their
project for the last four years. Tom Schnackenberg, chief
technologist, is considered one of the best, if not the
best brain in the world, in the area of sail development, rig
development and indeed, hull development. Schnackenberg has
formed a team that is really very impressive in technological
support and innovation.
The Prada organisation is world class, as we have seen over
the last few weeks against AmericaOne. They leave little to be
desired in the form of technology, led by Doug Peterson, who
has been involved in the winning team in the last two
America's Cup campaigns: America3 in 1992, and Team
New Zealand in 1995.
So what about speed differences? Will there be any? Both
the black boats of Team New Zealand are a little fatter than
Prada, maybe by 10 centimetres or so at the beam waterline.
This in theory makes them a little faster than Prada in medium
fresh winds, a little slower in light winds. The bow shapes of
Team New Zealand are a little unconventional.
But all in all, if we see any real differences I believe it
won't be coming from the hulls, it will be coming from the
stuff above the deck, the sails and their interaction with the
mast. This is where the horsepower is produced, where the
rubber hits the road.
The Kiwis have been working on a new three-spreader rig,
which they call the "millennium" rig. The mast appears to be
deeper fore and aft (and hence stiffer) than those used by the
challengers, including Prada. Dennis Conner commented the
other day that the biggest speed jump he saw during the series
was when Peter Gilmour and his Nippon team put in a stiffer
mast midway through the challenger series. The result was a
more controllable mainsail and, in particular, the ability to
control more finitely the leach-twist profile.
These new 3DL [?]
carbon-fibre mainsails are monsters to control. Their leech
profiles are huge, almost coming straight out from the
masthead before curving down away to the boom. All to increase
the area up high and move closer to what we call an
"elliptical" profile. This means less three-dimensional drag
-- called induced drag. Induced drag is slow, really slow so
any way to minimise this is a real bonus. Hence these massive
roach profiles. The monster mainsail roaches, however, put a
huge premium on the fore and aft stiffness of the masts …
hence the battle to get stiffer and stiffer masts into these
boats.
We know from one-design racing that the mainsail-mast-jib
combination and how this reacts to wind speed variations is
absolutely vital for boat speed. We can see minutes separating
fast boats from slow boats around the track when one rig is
better tuned than the other, and in these cases all on
one-design hulls.
It is interesting to note that Southern Spars of New
Zealand has built the masts for both of these successful
syndicates. If the Kiwis' "millennium" rig indeed works, it
will also offer slightly less aerodynamic drag than the more
conventional four-spreader configuration -- another
improvement. All these little advances can become significant
when tallied up -- time will tell.
We still have not seen the sail inventory arsenal of Team
New Zealand being used in full battle. I would not be
surprised to see some sails come out of the bag that could be
quite different from anything we've seen on the track so far.
The Kiwis have been developing their sail and rig combination
over the last four years for this set of races. The Team New
Zealand sail/rig development programme has a larger budget
than their hull, keel and winglet programme, all pointing to
what they at least believe are the opportunities for
improvement.
From the sailing enthusiast's point of view, it will be
interesting to see these two highly developed machines come
off the line in Race 1 and observe the weapons they are using.
To give you an idea of costs for these little engines aloft,
with oneAustralia in 1995, we paid approximately US$65,000 per
mainsail and $25,000 per genoa. A chute was a cool $21,000.
The new Cuben-fibre Prada chutes probably cost around $50,000
a pop. Not bad spare change.
In 1983 John Bertrand, skippering Australia II,
became the first non-American to win the America's Cup, ending
the New York Yacht Club's 132-year winning streak with a 4-3
victory against Dennis Conner. He is co-founder of Quokka
Sports.
Go to Expert Commentary // Index
Go to Commentary // John Bertrand // Index